Think twice before viewing or buying 36 Cavendish Road Salford M7 4WW
Professional reports on No. 36 find a party wall that breaches the Building Regulations, and serious structural defects.
Repossessed. The previous owner’s bank has repossessed the property, and we have reason to believe it will be coming onto the market. Your own checks are essential.
Everything here is taken from structural, party wall, building survey and fire engineering reports (2025–2026).
- In the loft, the fire separation stops short of the roof.
- The wall is 100mm blockwork built on the floorboards, with open voids between the houses.
- Putting it right means digging below basement level to replace the foundations with new screw piles.
Schematic only, not a drawing of the actual houses. The red line is the party wall the two houses share.
What the reports found, in brief
Never signed off
Building Control confirms no completion certificate was issued for the party wall.
Party wall report, April 2025Breaches the regulations
The party wall fails Parts A (structure), B (fire) and E (sound) of the Building Regulations.
Party wall report, April 2025Not fit for habitation
The defective wall “does not render either property fit for habitation in its current form”.
Party wall report, April 2025Not stable
In its current condition the building does not meet the Building Regulations requirement to be stable.
Structural engineer, October 2025Keep it unoccupied
The fire engineer advises keeping No. 36 unoccupied until remedial works are done.
Fire engineering report, July 2026Under investigation
Salford City Council has referred the concerns to its Planning Enforcement and Building Control teams, which are investigating.
Salford City Council
The party wall: a fundamental breach of Building Regulations
Chartered building engineer’s party wall report, April 2025
“So fundamentally deficient in its compliance with the Building Regulations that it is as if no effective separation exists at all … for all practical purposes, 34 and 36 Cavendish Road remain a single dwelling.”
Never signed off
Removed in 2008 and rebuilt around 2009. Building Control confirms no completion certificate was issued, as the final inspection never took place, and there is no Building Control record of the wall being rebuilt.
Breaches structure, fire and sound rules
100mm blockwork built on the floorboards, with open voids between the houses. It fails Parts A (structure), B (fire) and E (sound); its failure is “absolute and indisputable”.
Not fit for habitation
The report states the defective wall “does not render either property fit for habitation in its current form”.
Treated as one dwelling
Until it is rectified, Nos. 34 and 36 “must be treated as a single unit in terms of Building Regulations compliance”. Re-separating them is a material change of use, so current standards apply and planning permission may be required.
It straddles both houses
Putting it right needs works inside both houses, access to No. 34, and the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 procedure.
Fire separation fails
Below the required 60 minutes’ fire resistance. Gaps and voids could let fire, smoke and hot gases pass directly between the houses; unprotected steels are a collapse risk in a fire; in the loft the separation stops short of the roof.
What putting it right involves
Just a small glimpse of the works.
- Strip out both houses along the wall; prop them on temporary structural supports.
- Cut out the floor joists, floorboards and steel beams (RSJs) that run through both houses.
- Dig below basement level to replace the foundations with new screw piles.
- Fully rebuild the party wall, with fire separation up to the roof.
Several months of work, at a cost in the hundreds of thousands of pounds for the party wall alone, before the roof, stability, foundation and drainage works.
The structural engineer’s findings
Chartered structural engineer (CEng MIStructE), October 2025
Not stable
Internal load-bearing walls were removed; in its current condition the building does not meet the Building Regulations requirement to be stable.
Overloaded steels and foundations
Beams, column and foundations likely carry more load than designed for, with no calculations; overstressing may crush joist ends and cause progressive failure.
Walls too long and thin
Flank and party walls run over 9m without buttressing, in breach of the regulations; a rear-extension pier is non-compliant.
Loft conversion
No drawings or calculations exist; the engineer recommends opening up to check the roof was strengthened for it.
Floors and cracking
Significant distortion to the reception-room floor; cracking likely from excessive beam deflection.
The building survey
RICS building surveyor, July 2025
Stability at risk
“With the main structural elements … suffering from significant and multidirectional movement, the structural stability of the property is at risk.”
Roof slide
The roof is pushing the walls out at the top: dips, stepped cracking in the roof void, a poorly supported purlin, failed valleys.
Walls moving
Bay falling and twisted, walls bowing at first, second and roof level, rear extension twisting and falling, lintels dropping, possible wall-tie failure.
Possible subsidence
Movement may be due to inadequate foundations or defective, backed-up drains; the engineer recommends opening up to check for subsidence, and underpinning if needed.
Fire doors
Four storeys, but doors poorly fitted and missing fire strips and closers.
What the experts advise
- Fire engineerKeep No. 36 unoccupied until remedial works are done.
- Structural engineerComplete reconstruction may be more cost-effective than repair.
- Chartered surveyorEven demolition needs major temporary works to support the party wall.
Salford City Council is investigating
Salford City Council’s Housing Compliance and Enforcement team has referred the concerns to its Planning Enforcement and Building Control teams, which are currently investigating.
Before committing
Whether you are viewing, offering or exchanging.
- Speak to us, the attached neighbour at No. 34.
- Get your own structural, fire-safety and drainage surveys, and consult Building Control.
- Establish the full scope and cost of works needed for the property to be compliant, mortgageable and habitable.
Prospective purchasers, solicitors and surveyors: copies of the reports are available on request.
Questions buyers ask
Has the party wall at 36 Cavendish Road been signed off?
No. Building Control confirms no completion certificate was issued, as the final inspection never took place, and there is no Building Control record of the wall being rebuilt.
Is 36 Cavendish Road fit to live in?
The party wall report states the defective wall “does not render either property fit for habitation in its current form”. The fire engineer advises keeping No. 36 unoccupied until remedial works are done.
Can the party wall be put right from No. 36 alone?
No. The wall straddles both houses. Putting it right needs works inside both houses, access to No. 34, and the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 procedure.
How long will the work take, and what will it cost?
Several months of work, at a cost in the hundreds of thousands of pounds for the party wall alone, before the roof, stability, foundation and drainage works.
Can I see the reports?
Prospective purchasers, solicitors and surveyors can have copies on request. Call or WhatsApp Anthony on 07429 610509, or email info@36cavendishroad.co.uk.
Who has published this page?
Anthony Geller, the attached neighbour at No. 34 Cavendish Road. The two houses share the party wall, so its condition affects No. 34 too.